Homily - 21st Sunday in OT -
Year A,
Buzzword - Leadership - Probably the understatement of the year is to say
that leadership is in a state of crisis at whatever level we look - political,
commercial, church. But leadership, generally, is only a reflection of the
community at large. Today's readings touch on this question of leadership.
Today's readings refer to this role of leadership within, and by, the people of
God.
Isaiah 22: 19-23: Isaiah draws attention to the character who, through
default, was deprived of his leadership because he had failed to live up to his
responsibilities. He had been given an assignment and had failed and, so, was
dismissed from his office.
Romans 11: 33-36: Paul is concerned with the failure of his people, the
Jews, to accept the leadership of Christ; but, directed by his great faith, he
proclaims that, in God's own good time and place, the plan of salvation will be
carried out.
Matthew 16: 13-20: In the Gospel we have the foundations of the structure
of teaching authority vested in Peter and, from him, to be transmitted to
following generations and preserved for us today in the person of the Pope as
the legitimate successor of Peter..
Point 1: One of the favourite indoor sports of people, universally, is to
criticise leadership. There is nothing new in this; where people have an option,
invariably, they will continue to assess the performance of those exercising
leadership and, in due course, bring about a change if not satisfied. We call it
'democracy'! Whether such change is for better or for worse, only time tells.
But even when the prospect of change is not readily available, the practice of
criticism still goes on, and the Church is no exception.
Point 2: Here, leadership is not immune; unfortunately, many of the
complaints are valid - sermons are too long or too dull; many are bad
administrators; some are too short-tempered, others are not punctual; others are
too worldly because they mix freely while others are too aloof; others are
'boozers' because they enjoy a drink, and others are 'wowsers' because they
don't! Well! it probably helps to remember that there is no such thing as the
perfect human being - bar one, Jesus - and anyone whose allegiance to the Church
depends entirely on the virtue, the intelligence, the professional competence of
the clergy, the professed religious or the hierarchy of the Church, or another
member of the Church, has truly based his faith on shifting sands. There is no
dual standard of morality - one for the clergy and one for others; we are all in
there batting under the same rules. It may be expected, legitimately, that par
for the course should be achieved more frequently by the leaders; but it must
not be forgotten that we are all pilgrims aspiring to greatness, and that most
us, most of the time, are substantially less than great.
To complain about the quality of leaders is not a new custom and has been
present in the Church from earliest times. Even Christ did not escape! The
record shows how He came under fire - wining and dining with disreputable types
to the exclusion of the 'social' leaders! [Luke 7:37] And a woman in the city,
who was a sinner, having learned that he was eating in the Pharisee's house,
brought an alabaster jar of ointment.
She stood behind him at his feet, weeping, and began to bathe his feet with her
tears and to dry them with her hair. Then she continued kissing his feet and
anointing them with the ointment. Now when the Pharisee who had invited him saw
it, he said to himself, "If this man were a prophet, he would have known who and
what kind of woman this is who is touching him - that she is a sinner." And
Peter, too, found himself in a no win situation being criticised by Paul for not
allowing uncircumcised people to become Christians; and then by the Jewish
converts for allowing Gentiles to be baptised. As they say -'Damned if you do!
And damned if you don't"!
Conclusion: No one argues that anyone should be exempt from criticism;
but it can be expected that the criticism offered should be of a constructive
form. Through Baptism, every Christian is called to be an example to others;
failure to do so exposes one to criticism. With this in mind we should be
constantly asking ourselves -"What impression of Christianity are people getting
from the life I lead"? If it is not one of openness and fairness, honesty and
fidelity, a full life in which one recognises an independent and ultimate
judgement, then we need to look to our laurels. [Matt 5:15] "No one after
lighting a lamp puts it under the bushel basket, but on the lamp stand, and it
gives light to all in the house". To do so, however, is to invite criticism.
Scriptural reference: For John came neither eating nor drinking, and they
say, 'He has a demon'; the Son of Man came eating and drinking, and they say,
'Look, a glutton and a drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and sinners!' Yet
wisdom is vindicated by her deeds." [Mat 11:18-19]
Compiled by Father Noel J. Tobin